Post by Admin/YBB on Sept 7, 2021 7:11:24 GMT -6
M* Amy Arnott on Lifetime Income from an Annuity
M* has recently done several pieces on lifetime income from annuities. This one from Amy Arnott is quite thoughtful. It suggests the use of income-gap (= total expected income - total expected expenses) and then uses a simple formula to estimate how much to annuitize. Basically, if the income-gap is much higher than what can be provided with safe withdrawal rate (SWR) from a portfolio, then a portion of the portfolio may be annuitized.
where AR = annuity payout rate (%), SWR = safe withdrawal rare (%), WR = required withdrawal rate from portfolio (%)
Annuitizing is an irrevocable decision. Single-life annuities can be risky, but guaranteed withdrawal periods of 10, 15, 20 years are available (typically, these must be less than the life-expectancy) (having a joint-life annuity is another option). Make sure that the insurance company has a high credit-rating.
QLAC from IRA, 401k or 403b are also mentioned - the amount annuitized is limited but is removed from the RMD calculations. Variable annuities are not discussed - these can range from basic to complex.
www.morningstar.com/articles/1056871/do-you-need-an-annuity-for-retirement-income
(highlight link text--Go to http://www....; or highlight link text--copy (don't copy link address)--paste in a new tab to open)
YBB Note
The formula above is derived by equating the withdrawal at WR from portfolio P with that from a combination of withdrawal at AR from annuitized z*P plus withdrawal at SWR from the remainder (1 - z)*P; z = fraction of portfolio annuitized.
WR*P = AR*z*P + SWR*(1 - z)*P
Then, the fraction of portfolio annuitized, z = (WR - SWR)/(AR - SWR), or 100z%.
Note that if WR > SWR, z > 0, i.e. annuitization is necessary when the withdrawal rate (WR) exceeds the safe withdrawal rate SWR.
If WR < SWR, then z < 0, then annuitization is not necessary (but some may partially annuitize anyway to cover basic expenses).
M* has recently done several pieces on lifetime income from annuities. This one from Amy Arnott is quite thoughtful. It suggests the use of income-gap (= total expected income - total expected expenses) and then uses a simple formula to estimate how much to annuitize. Basically, if the income-gap is much higher than what can be provided with safe withdrawal rate (SWR) from a portfolio, then a portion of the portfolio may be annuitized.
where AR = annuity payout rate (%), SWR = safe withdrawal rare (%), WR = required withdrawal rate from portfolio (%)
Annuitizing is an irrevocable decision. Single-life annuities can be risky, but guaranteed withdrawal periods of 10, 15, 20 years are available (typically, these must be less than the life-expectancy) (having a joint-life annuity is another option). Make sure that the insurance company has a high credit-rating.
QLAC from IRA, 401k or 403b are also mentioned - the amount annuitized is limited but is removed from the RMD calculations. Variable annuities are not discussed - these can range from basic to complex.
www.morningstar.com/articles/1056871/do-you-need-an-annuity-for-retirement-income
(highlight link text--Go to http://www....; or highlight link text--copy (don't copy link address)--paste in a new tab to open)
YBB Note
The formula above is derived by equating the withdrawal at WR from portfolio P with that from a combination of withdrawal at AR from annuitized z*P plus withdrawal at SWR from the remainder (1 - z)*P; z = fraction of portfolio annuitized.
WR*P = AR*z*P + SWR*(1 - z)*P
Then, the fraction of portfolio annuitized, z = (WR - SWR)/(AR - SWR), or 100z%.
Note that if WR > SWR, z > 0, i.e. annuitization is necessary when the withdrawal rate (WR) exceeds the safe withdrawal rate SWR.
If WR < SWR, then z < 0, then annuitization is not necessary (but some may partially annuitize anyway to cover basic expenses).